An arithmetical reconstruction of the liar's antinomy using addition and multiplication

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (3):457-461 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peirce's paradoxical solution to the Liar's Paradox.Emily Michael - 1975 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (3):369-374.
On the proofs of arithmetical completeness for interpretability logic.Domenico Zambella - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (4):542-551.
A note on Conway multiplication of ordinals.John Hickman - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):143-145.
A note on the arithmetical hierarchy.Stephen L. Bloom - 1968 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 9 (1):89-91.
An arithmetical completeness theorem for pre-permutations.Friedemann Tuttas - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (1):84-89.
Number theory for the ordinals with a new definition for multiplication.Harry Gonshor - 1980 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (4):708-710.
A reconstruction of formal logic.George Goe - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (2):129-157.
Corrections to my paper "A reconstruction of formal logic".George Goe - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7:158.
John Buridan on the Liar: a study and reconstruction.Paul Vincent Spade - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (4):579-590.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
40 (#564,522)

6 months
17 (#176,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references