Can Communities Produce Complex Technology? Looking Into Space for Insight

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 41 (2-3):35-45 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines a community producing complex space technology. We attempt to highlight which aspects of the community’s activities can help democratize high-tech development while providing a context for similar cases involved in developing and manufacturing nonhigh-technological artefacts. We discuss how this has been made possible by using a technology-determined organizational approach based on the CubeSat open platform infrastructure, blending formal and hands-on education, open communication, specific recruitment and working practices, and a genuine passion for technology. We identify as critical enablers for community-based collaborative development of space technology the open-source architecture standard called CubeSat Design Specifications, the modularization of work in subsystems and between different organizations, and the open and participatory approach work tasks distribution and decision making. Moreover, we argue that the digital/informational aspect of this technology allows the community to implement organizational practices that resemble how open-source movements over the internet produce complex digital artefacts like Wikipedia or Linux. ESTCube can shed light on community-driven complex technology development, providing lessons on what a democratized version of high technology would resemble and how open and digitalized technology can help develop the capacities of a community.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century?Leon Benade - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (8):796-807.
The Interests of High-Technology Industry.Hermann G. Grimmeiss - 1985 - In Michael Gibbons & Björn Wittrock (eds.), Science as a commodity: threats to the open community of scholars. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman. pp. 99.
Does Technology Contribute to Meaningful Learning?Toma Strle - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (2):343-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-30

Downloads
12 (#1,357,717)

6 months
5 (#1,015,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited.Andrew Feenberg - 2002 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Andrew Feenberg.
The technological construction of social power.Philip Brey - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95.

View all 9 references / Add more references