On Theory Dependence of Truth in Measurement

Perspectives on Science 29 (6):757-781 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Measurement results are stated in terms of sentences ascribing measured values, as obtained via measurement processes, to measurands, as defined by measuring agents. Since both the definition of the measurands and the characterization of the processes depend on models constructed on the basis of relevant theories, the issue arises of the theory dependence of the truth of those sentences. This paper aims at assessing the question by introducing suitable distinctions about the sense and reference of the terms used to refer to individual and general quantities, in a framework where measurement is construed as an agent-dependent, model-based, purpose-driven activity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-02

Downloads
35 (#645,327)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alessandro Giordani
Università Cattolica di Milano

References found in this work

Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement.Eran Tal - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1159-1173.
An Architectonic for Science.Wolfgang Balzer, C. Ulises Moulines & Joseph D. Sneed - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):349-350.

View all 12 references / Add more references