Popular Song and Ethics: Ethical Perspectives and Personal Qualities

British Journal of Aesthetics 65 (1):19-32 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jerrold Levinson has elegantly defended a proposal for the ethical evaluation of popular songs, which looks at the ‘personal qualities’ a song exhibits. I claim that the personal-qualities theory of artistic expression importantly contributes to explaining how songs get to have their meanings, yet that it does not very profitably extend to their ethical evaluation. I propose that the notion of a work’s ethical perspective best generates a central way of ethically evaluating popular songs, by properly linking the ethical evaluation of songs to their meanings. Reference to songs’ ethical perspectives proves able to (a) enjoy broad scope; (b) produce charitable ethical assessments; (c) generate fine-grained and comparative attributions of ethical value; and (d) deal, better than the personal-qualities view, with songs that include multiple characters, manifest despicable personae without explicitly condemning them, or exhibit a persona that eschews ethical evaluation. Investigating the theoretical centrality of this type of ethical judgment also provides us with an opportunity to better understand what construing the meaning of songs—and more generally works of art—involves: when relevant, the proper construal of works’ ethical perspectives’ objects, and of the perspectives themselves as often presenting us with outlooks just for our consideration, not approval. I close by suggesting a possible relationship between our song preferences and our sense of self, via David Hume’s notion of pride: the songs we favour help us with self-perception and -assessment, and perhaps with self-construction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,956

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rubber Ring: Why do we listen to sad songs?Aaron Smuts - 2011 - In Noël Carroll & John Gibson (eds.), Narrative, Emotion, and Insight. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 131.
Folk Song as Hybrid Art Form.David Atkinson - 2022 - British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (3):419-430.
Ethical Criticism in Perspective: A Defense of Radical Moralism.Alessandro Giovannelli - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (4):335-348.
Shelley’s Oppositional Songs.Nancy Moore Goslee - 2019 - The European Legacy 24 (3-4):348-367.
A Philosophy of Cover Songs.P. D. Magnus - 2022 - Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-24

Downloads
6 (#1,708,821)

6 months
6 (#857,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alessandro Giovannelli
Lafayette College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Art, Emotion and Ethics.Berys Gaut - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):199-201.
The Ethics of Singing Along: The Case of “Mind of a Lunatic”.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (1):121-129.
'Pride produces the idea of self': Hume on moral agency.Améelie Oksenberg Rorty - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (3):255 – 269.

View all 6 references / Add more references