Galileo and Platonistic Methodology

Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (4):501 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a critical examination the claim that Galileo was a Platonist. It contends that neither his use of mathematics (as Koyre asserts), nor his hypothetic-deductive method of testing (as Cassirer maintains), nor a realistic interpretation of this abstract theories (as Crombie argues) offers reasonable and consistent evidence that Galileo shared or advocated the metaphysics or methods of Plato.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Die wissenschaftstheorie galileis — oder: Contra Feyerabend. [REVIEW]Klaus Fischer - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):165 - 197.
Die Wissenschaftstheorie Galileis — oder: Contra FeyerabendGalileo's philosophy of science — or: Contra feyerabend.Klaus Fischer - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):165-197.
Galileo and Plato.Alexandre Koyre - 1943 - Journal of the History of Ideas 4 (4):400.
Experiences and the Bible in Galileo’s Letter to Castelli.Matjaž Vesel - 2015 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 37 (2):123-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
18 (#1,108,484)

6 months
8 (#528,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

T. R. Girill
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references