Horrendous Evil and the Loving God: a Reply to Joshua Thurow

Sophia 61 (2):419-428 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marilyn McCord Adams has defended theodicy by appeal to the idea of post-mortem compensation for the victims of horrendous evil. I have argued that this overlooks the dissociation of theodicy from moral reality that she concedes in her response to criticism of theodicy by D Z Phillips. Joshua Thurow has recently defended Adams against my argument. Here I defend and strengthen that argument against Thurow.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-04

Downloads
59 (#398,686)

6 months
14 (#232,717)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Gleeson
Flinders University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations