Tocqueville’s Prediction about the Pantheistic Tendency of ‘the Democratic Social State’ and Catholicism’s Present Situation

Catholic Social Science Review 22:123-135 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores Tocqueville’s fears about the future of religion in the “democratic social state” and their relevance to the future of Catholicism in America. While Tocqueville valued the Protestant public culture democracy inherited from aristocracy because it provided the “moral ties” needed to prevent “democratic freedom” from becoming “democratic despotism,” he worried that this culture would not endure in the face of democracy’s inner dynamism. It also explores why Tocqueville thought that Catholicism might survive democratic pantheism longer than Protestantism. The fact that events seem to have vindicated his “dread” about the future of religion so far, suggests that democracy’s recent attempt to suppress Catholic morality on abortion and contraceptive coverage in employee health insurance, the definition of “family” in adoption policy, and so on, puts that survival in question. The dangers to the religious liberty of Catholics today thus seem rooted in the democratic social state’s permanent nature rather than in more recent and historically contingent developments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Gary Glenn and Kenneth Grasso.L. Joseph Hebert - 2014 - Catholic Social Science Review 19:47-53.
Christianity, Democracy, Socialism.Daniel J. Mahoney - 2014 - Catholic Social Science Review 19:39-46.
Tocqueville’s Aristocratic Christianity.Peter Augustine Lawler - 2012 - Catholic Social Science Review 17:21-32.
Tocqueville, Religion, and Modernity.Carson Holloway - 2012 - Catholic Social Science Review 17:55-60.
Between Scylla and Charybdis.John P. Moran - 2017 - Catholic Social Science Review 22:189-202.
Response to Daniel Mahoney.Adam Seagrave - 2014 - Catholic Social Science Review 19:55-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-24

Downloads
7 (#1,634,629)

6 months
5 (#1,002,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references