Contrastive, non-probabilistic statistical explanations

Philosophy of Science 65 (3):448-471 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Standard models of statistical explanation face two intractable difficulties. In his 1984 Salmon argues that because statistical explanations are essentially probabilistic we can make sense of statistical explanation only by rejecting the intuition that scientific explanations are contrastive. Further, frequently the point of a statistical explanation is to identify the etiology of its explanandum, but on standard models probabilistic explanations often fail to do so. This paper offers an alternative conception of statistical explanations on which explanations of the frequency of a property consist in the derivation of that frequency from a statistical specification of the mechanism by which instances of the relevant property are produced. Such explanations are contrastive precisely because they identify the determinate causal etiologies of their explananda.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,097

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are statistical explanations possible?Lorenz Krüger - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-146.
Contrastive statistical explanation and causal heterogeneity.Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):435-452.
Causality and Unification: How Causality Unifies Statistical Regularities.Gerhard Schurz - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (1):73.
Really Statistical Explanations and Genetic Drift.Marc Lange - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (2):169-188.
Deductivism Visited and Revisited.Wesley C. Salmon - 1997 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Causality and Explanation. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Deductive chauvinism.Henrik Hållsten - 1999 - Synthese 120 (1):49-59.
Do large probabilities explain better?Michael Strevens - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):366-390.
Probabilistic Causal Processes.Jonathan Richard Katz - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#213,303)

6 months
6 (#571,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Glymour
Kansas State University

References found in this work

From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Patricia Cheng - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):367-405.
The Logic of Reliable Inquiry.Kevin Kelly - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):351-354.
Causality without counterfactuals.Wesley C. Salmon - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):297-312.

View all 8 references / Add more references