Revisions of bootstrap testing

Philosophy of Science 50 (4):626-629 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of J STOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. J STOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non—commercial use.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
100 (#210,644)

6 months
22 (#134,996)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

The irrelevance of bootstrapping.David Christensen - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):644-662.
What Revisions Does Bootstrap Testing Need?Jan M. Żytkow - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):101 - 109.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Glymour on evidential relevance.David Christensen - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.

Add more references