The Evaluation of Quranic Statements Related to Satan Discortion in terms of Freedom of Will

Kader 17 (1):185-206 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are statements in the Qur'an that Satan has an influence on human will. In many verses, it is recalled that the devil and his followers are the greatest enemy of mankind, and they set up traps to mislead humans. The expressions that are related to these satans from humans and demons make people think that they are desperate against their traps and cause some questions about whether human beings have full freedom in their actions. As a matter of fact, there are some interpretations in opposition to the freedom of will in the commentary sources regarding these verses. In some passages in the Qur'an it is emphasized that the traps set up by the devil are weak and can be overcome. This situation makes it necessary to evaluate the issue in terms of theology. As a matter of fact, the attempts of the devils to divert human freedom were handled along with the subjects of human freedom and responsibility in their actions in Kalam sources; and discussed in the light of human actions, the role of will in actions and freedom of will. In this study, how misguided actions of the devil and his followers affect the human will and whether this influence brings a limitation to the free will; will be discussed together with the relevant theological discussions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free will, neuroethics, psychology and theology.Geran F. Dodson - 2017 - Wilmington, Delaware, United States: Vernon Press.
Being for-Itself in Sartre’s Philosophy: A Critical Examination.Reza Amiri - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 8 (31-32):293-319.
Freedom and rationality.Fred Vollmer - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (2):167–177.
Thomas Hobbes.Thomas Pink - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 473–480.
Action and responsibility.Tim O'Keefe - 2009 - In James Warren (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-25

Downloads
27 (#830,567)

6 months
13 (#266,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references