A critique of Alloy and Tabachnik's theoretical framework for understanding covariation assessment

&
Psychological Review 95 (2):296-298 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.296

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Expectations and situational information as cocontributors to covariation assessment: A reply to Goddard and Allan.Lauren B. Alloy - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (2):299-301.
Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information.Lauren B. Alloy & Naomi Tabachnik - 1984 - Psychological Review 91 (1):112-149.
Updating, evidence evaluation, and operator availability: A theoretical framework for understanding belief.Joseph Sommer, Julien Musolino & Pernille Hemmer - 2024 - Psychological Review 131 (2):373-401.
Covariation in natural causal induction.Patricia W. Cheng & Laura R. Novick - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (2):365-382.
Positive bias in the perception of covariation.Yaakov Kareev - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (3):490-502.
The supposed competition between theories of human causal inference.David Danks - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):259 – 272.
From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Patricia Cheng - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):367-405.
How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation.Dustin Wood, Molly Hensler Gardner & P. D. Harms - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (1):84-111.
A critique of G. W. Allport's theory of motivation.Peter A. Bertocci - 1940 - Psychological Review 47 (6):501-532.
Differentiating mental models of self and others: A hierarchical framework for knowledge assessment.Aakriti Kumar, Padhraic Smyth & Mark Steyvers - 2023 - Psychological Review 130 (6):1566-1591.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
14 (#1,279,562)

6 months
4 (#1,252,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references