Images as Arguments: Progress and Problems, a Brief Commentary

Argumentation 29 (2):235-238 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This brief editorial considers a special issue of Argumentation edited by Jens Kjeldsen on visual, multimodal argumentation. It provides a commentary on important advances on interpretative problems such as the propositionality of argument, the reducibility of images to words, whether argument products are primarily cognitive artifacts, and the nature of a modality of argument. Concerning the project of argument appraisal, it considers whether visual arguments call for a revision of our normative, evaluative apparatus

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,289

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
44 (#561,640)

6 months
3 (#1,179,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Godden
Michigan State University

References found in this work

Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
Meta-argumentation.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2013 - College Publications.
Two concepts of argument.Daniel J. O'Keefe - 1992 - In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit, Readings in argumentation. New York: Foris Publications. pp. 11--79.
Logic, Art and Argument.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).

View all 13 references / Add more references