Images as Arguments: Progress and Problems, a Brief Commentary

Argumentation 29 (2):235-238 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This brief editorial considers a special issue of Argumentation edited by Jens Kjeldsen on visual, multimodal argumentation. It provides a commentary on important advances on interpretative problems such as the propositionality of argument, the reducibility of images to words, whether argument products are primarily cognitive artifacts, and the nature of a modality of argument. Concerning the project of argument appraisal, it considers whether visual arguments call for a revision of our normative, evaluative apparatus

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
41 (#536,192)

6 months
4 (#1,232,791)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Godden
Michigan State University

References found in this work

Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
Meta-argumentation.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2013 - College Publications.
Two concepts of argument.Daniel J. O'Keefe - 1992 - In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in argumentation. New York: Foris Publications. pp. 11--79.
Logic, Art and Argument.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).

View all 13 references / Add more references