Naturally Understanding Naturalism

Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):79-90 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his excellent book World without Design, Michael Rea argues that naturalism is not a philosophical thesis but a research program. I believe that there is good reason to question Rea’s claim about naturalism. In this brief paper, I critique Rea’s argument and defend a particular understanding of naturalism as a philosophical thesis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
94 (#224,389)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Charm of Naturalism.Barry Stroud - 1996 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70 (2):43 - 55.
Versions.[author unknown] - 1908 - The Classical Review 22 (3):101-101.
Versions.[author unknown] - 1909 - The Classical Review 23 (4):138-139.
Naturalism, Free Choices, And Conscious Experiences.Andrew Melnyk - 2007 - God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.

Add more references