Author’s Response: Humble Research and the Inescapability of Limited Knowledge

Constructivist Foundations 16 (3):351-355 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: After clarifying some misunderstandings, I discuss the inescapability of bias in research in more practical terms, followed by an exemplification of why epigenetics does not shatter a …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inescapability Revisited.Luca Ferrero - 2018 - Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 41 (4):113-158.
A Biased “Radical” or a False Choice?James W. Davis - 2021 - Constructivist Foundations 16 (3):347-349.
The Impossibility of Unbiased and Apolitical Research.Philip Baron - 2021 - Constructivist Foundations 16 (3):342-344.
Author’s Response: Is God a Radical Constructivist?A. Quale - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):140-147.
Author’s Response: Persevering with the Non-Trivial.U. Kordeš - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):400-406.
Author's Response: Constructivism as Possibility?M. Füllsack - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):23-25.
Author’s Response: Denying the Global Observer.D. Gasparyan - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):253-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-24

Downloads
15 (#1,238,350)

6 months
7 (#722,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references