Can the Confucian dream of peace dialogue with Realpolitik?

Philosophy and Social Criticism (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An economy based on agriculture required access to both tillage and tillers. Power was shared by two groups in the ruling class. The warriors’ priority was to mobilize the tillers for war and the acquisition of more lands by conquest at the cost of peace and agriculture. The priority of their rivals in power, known colloquially as ‘Mandarins’ in European languages, was to liberate the tillers from warfare and to promote peace and agriculture. The technocratic Mandarins could not use martial prowess to defeat the warriors’ ‘hard power’. Confucian thought emerged from this continuous struggle as a ‘soft power’ strategy. Today, Chinese thinkers and strategists are reinterpreting Confucian ideals to promote a ‘harmonious society’ and a ‘harmonious world’ based on a classical Confucian concept of the entire world as one common space to be shared harmoniously, perhaps responding to a collective ‘Western’ vision of self-interested Realpolitik with a Confucian dream of peace.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-01

Downloads
2 (#1,898,268)

6 months
2 (#1,696,787)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references