Commentary: Weighing the Balance

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):415-416 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am inclined to agree with Arthur Caplan that a less invasive means than was employed in the case of Ashley X would have been preferable. But, such means do not, as yet, exist. Given these circumstances, what are the issues that the bioethics committee needs to consider prior to making a recommendation to the surgeon?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Actually Happened.[author unknown] - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):416-416.
The Case: The “Ashley Treatment” Revisited.Ruchika Mishra - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):407.
Ethics Committees: Group Process Concerns and the Need for Research.Gregory J. Hayes - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):83.
Toward an Africanized Bioethics Curriculum.Kevin G. Behrens & C. S. Wareham - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):103-113.
Commentary.Andrew Thurman - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):129-130.
Commentary.Anne McLaren - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):190-193.
Ward ethics:" What do I do now?"" Who am I?".Griffin Trotter & K. Christensen - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (2):208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
51 (#427,603)

6 months
15 (#206,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references