Reply to Rik Peels

Journal of Philosophical Research 47:243-247 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rik Peels (2022) suggests that my account of the normative pressures involved in cases of testimony from a friend need to be supplemented. I respond by accepting the proposed supplements; in fact, I argue that they are implications of the view I defended.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An open theist critique of Peels’ account of divine repentance.Ferhat Yöney - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-15.
On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels.Pierre LeMorvan - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2):335-344.
Rik Peels’ Ignorance: A Philosophical Study.Daniel R. DeNicola - 2023 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 13 (3):239-254.
Against Voluntarism about Doxastic Responsibility.Stephen J. White - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Research 44:33-51.
Reply to Breno Santos.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Research 47:259-263.
Reply to Breno Santos.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Research 47:259-263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-29

Downloads
21 (#1,013,103)

6 months
6 (#882,325)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sanford Goldberg
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references