Why the substitution of co-referential expressions in a statement may result in change of truth-value (Concluding Part)

The Reasoner 1 (2):6-7 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Some Remarks on Indiscernibility.Ali Kazmi - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 18 (sup1):167-178.
Reference and propositional attitudes.Brian Loar - 1972 - Philosophical Review 81 (1):43-62.
The reference principle: A defence.David Dolby - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):286-296.
On Referential Opacity in Spinoza's Ethics.Kian Mintz-Woo - 2009 - Praxis 2 (2).
A drawback for substitutional arguments.Justina Diaz-Legaspe & Sennet Adam - 2021 - Language Sciences 88 (November).
Simple sentences, substitution, and intuitions * by Jennifer Saul.Jennifer Saul - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):174-176.
Simple sentences, substitution, and intuitions • by Jennifer Saul.Jennifer Duke-Yonge - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):174-176.
Laurence Goldstein.P. Cave - 2015 - Analysis 75 (1):78-78.
Platitudes against paradox.Sven Rosenkranz & Arash Sarkohi - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):319 - 341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-18

Downloads
44 (#506,602)

6 months
9 (#489,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laurence Goldstein
PhD: University of St. Andrews; Last affiliation: University of Kent

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references