An Innocuous Paradox

Dialogue 6 (2):231-235 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

McCall's argument has two stages. In the first, the hypothesis that someone has both perfect memory and perfect foreknowledge is shown to generate an infinite regress, and this is taken to establish the absurdity of that hypothesis; in the second, this absurdity is made the basis of a proof that time is asymmetrical.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moore’s Paradox and the Priority of Belief Thesis.John N. Williams - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1117-1138.
The Likeness Regress: Plato's "Parmenides" 132c12--133a7.Karl Darcy Otto - 2003 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
The Ontological Argument.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1994 - In Robert Merrihew Adams (ed.), Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Paradox and Relativism.H. Muhammad Legenhausen - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 11 (21):75-80.
A Neglected Regress Argument in the Parmenides.M. Schofield - 1973 - Classical Quarterly 23 (01):29-44.
An infinite temporal regress is compatible with the Doctrine of Creatio Originans.Paul Kabay - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2):123-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
29 (#781,382)

6 months
11 (#359,362)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references