Legitimate Intergenerational Constitutionalism

Intergenerational Justice Review 9 (2) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the legitimacy conditions of constitutionalism by examining one particular type of constitutional provision: provisions aimed at advancing future generations’ interests. After covering the main forms that such provisions can adopt; it first considers three legitimacy gains of constitutionalising them. It then explores two legitimacy concerns that so doing raises. Given that constitutions are difficult to amend; constitutionalisation may threaten future generations’ sovereignty. And it may also make the constitution’s content impossible to adapt to changing circumstances and interests. Finally; the paper examines the ways in which such concerns may be addressed at the adoption; formulation; and amendment stages. In particular; it discusses if the use of sunset clauses and regular constitutional conventions may; and under what conditions; successfully address such concerns.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-12

Downloads
108 (#202,431)

6 months
41 (#108,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iñigo González Ricoy
Universitat de Barcelona

References found in this work

Law and disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Law and Disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Inclusive Constitution‐Making: The Icelandic Experiment.Hélène Landemore - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2):166-191.
Constitutional Environmental Rights.Tim Hayward - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (4):530-532.

View all 10 references / Add more references