- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'
Argumentation 14 (3):287-292 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.Scott Jacobs - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):261-286.
Comments on `Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic'. [REVIEW]M. Van Der Poel - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):219-222.
Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century'.M. A. Van Rees - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):255-259.
Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives'.Eveline Feteris - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):235-239.
Comments 'Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric'.Bilal Amjarso - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):417-420.
Review of van Eemeren & Houtlosser (2002): Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]Alan G. Gross - 2003 - Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (2):386-390.
Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad. [REVIEW]Scott Jacobs - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):421-442.
Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation.Steven W. Patterson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):1-26.
Review of J. Crosswhite, Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom. [REVIEW]Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):475-479.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
40 (#561,410)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
2010-09-11
Downloads
40 (#561,410)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts.Jean Goodwin - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):285-296.
The Pragmatic Force of Making an Argument.Jean Goodwin & Beth Innocenti - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):669-680.
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.
A Normative Pragmatic Perspective on Appealing to Emotions in Argumentation.Beth Innocenti Manolescu - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):327-343.
References found in this work
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University of Toronto Press.
Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge.Charles Arthur Willard - 2009 - University Alabama Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2