On Reading

Acta Analytica 35 (1):51-59 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is reading? Seeing and comprehending a contentful, written text counts as reading, of course, but that is simply the paradigm; it is not reading itself. Blind people, e.g., often read using Braille. So, my project in this paper is to address this question: What is the proper analysis of person S reads text W? Surprisingly, no philosophical attempts to analyze reading exist; this question has yet to be tackled. Can other sensory modalities be used to read? What more can be said about the nature of the objects of reading, viz., texts? After critically assessing a few proposals, I defend a final analysis of reading according to which a person reads a text when she uses some sensory modality to cognitively attend to the word structures embedded in that text for the purposes of ultimately grasping its content. Moreover, S must not relentlessly fail to map W to some of W’s contents, and S’s comprehension of W’s contents must be a causal result of W.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-30

Downloads
63 (#350,759)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Goodman
James Madison University

Citations of this work

Summary Strategies for Literary Texts in English.Lavdosh Malaj - 2020 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 65 (1):7-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Language and Mind.Noam Chomsky - 1968 - Cambridge University Press.
In Defense of Reading.Sarah E. Worth - 2017 - Rowman & Littlefield International.

Add more references