Building Moral Robots: Ethical Pitfalls and Challenges

Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):141-157 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the ethical pitfalls and challenges that non-ethicists, such as researchers and programmers in the fields of computer science, artificial intelligence and robotics, face when building moral machines. Whether ethics is “computable” depends on how programmers understand ethics in the first place and on the adequacy of their understanding of the ethical problems and methodological challenges in these fields. Researchers and programmers face at least two types of problems due to their general lack of ethical knowledge or expertise. The first type is so-called rookie mistakes, which could be addressed by providing these people with the necessary ethical knowledge. The second, more difficult methodological issue concerns areas of peer disagreement in ethics, where no easy solutions are currently available. This paper examines several existing approaches to highlight the ethical pitfalls and challenges involved. Familiarity with these and similar problems can help programmers to avoid pitfalls and build better moral machines. The paper concludes that ethical decisions regarding moral robots should be based on avoiding what is immoral in combination with a pluralistic ethical method of solving moral problems, rather than relying on a particular ethical approach, so as to avoid a normative bias.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A challenge for machine ethics.Ryan Tonkens - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (3):421-438.
Verizon Lecture: Why Is It So Difficult to Be an Ethical Leader?Joanne B. Ciulla - 2018 - Business and Society Review 123 (2):369-383.
Why machines cannot be moral.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - AI and Society (3):685-693.
A decent proposal: ethical review of clinical research.Donald Evans - 1996 - New York, N.Y.: Wiley. Edited by Martyn Evans.
Six Challenges for Ethical Conduct in Science.Petteri Niemi - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1007-1025.
The ethical cycle.I. van de Poel & L. Royakkers - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1-13.
Artificial Intelligent Systems and Ethical Agency.Reena Cheruvalath - 2023 - Journal of Human Values 29 (1):33-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-31

Downloads
62 (#343,060)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John-Stewart Gordon
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences