Questions Concerning the Existences of Christ

In Friedman Emery (ed.), Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages: A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown. Brill (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Christian doctrine as formulated by the Council of Chalcedon (451), Christ is one person (one supposit, one hypostasis) existing in two natures (two essences), human and divine. The human and divine natures are not merged into a third nature, nor are they separated from one another in such a way that the divine nature goes with one person, namely, the Word of God, and the human nature with another person, namely, Jesus of Nazareth. The two natures belong to just one person, and the one person has two distinct natures. Chalcedon‟s justly-famous formula brought the debate into sharper focus and ruled out certain options, but of course it did not bring the arguments to a complete end. More councils,more debates, and more questions were to follow, although the range of disagreement tended to narrow. In the medieval Latin West, Peter Lombard (†1160) identified in book III of the Sententiae three “opinions” on the topic, but by the middle of the thirteenth century, it was widely agreed that only one of them was orthodox teaching. This relative unity of thought provided the space within which more detailed issues could be debated, and one of the most interesting of these concerned existence (esse): how many existences are there in Christ? Since Christ is only one person, it might seem that he has only one existence. On the other hand, he has two natures, so perhaps instead he has more than one existence. In this one paper, my goal is rather modest. I discuss only a few of the relevant authors, and I focus primarily on which questions they were asking. I proceed as follows. I first look at Thomas Aquinas, whose remarks on these topics had such a large influence on the debate later in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Crucial will be certain distinctions that Thomas makes, distinctions we can see as disambiguating the question we began with, namely, „How many existences are there in Christ?‟. After that I will look at how one of those distinctions makes its appearance in the writings of two post-Thomistic authors, Giles of Rome and Godfrey of Fontaines.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Incarnation.Richard Swinburne - 1994 - In The Christian God. New York: Oxford University Press.
Personal Unity and the Problem of Christ’s Knowledge.Michael Gorman - 2000 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74:175-186.
Composition and Christology.Brian Leftow - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):310-322.
Recent developments in analytic Christology.James M. Arcadi - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (4):e12480.
Nestorius and Nestorianism.Robert Merrihew Adams - 2021 - The Monist 104 (3):366-375.
Two in one: contradictory Christology without gluts?Franca D’Agostini - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-27.
Kenoticism and Essential Divine Properties.Eric Yang - forthcoming - Religious Studies.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-14

Downloads
680 (#38,332)

6 months
124 (#43,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Gorman
Catholic University of America

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references