Why Didn’t Plato Just Write Arguments? The Role of Image-Making in the Dialogues

Abstract

Several of Plato's dialogues seem to question the moral and epistemic value of image-making. Yet Plato's own word-images are powerful and alluring. I reconsider a conception of "Platonic" metaphysics in which the visible is denigrated relative to the purely intelligible, and in which only the latter can be an avenue to philosophical enlightenment. Viewing the apparent criticisms of image-making in the context of Plato's own use of images, I argue that his use of images can and does lead to philosophical enlightenment and that images are necessary, in addition to logico-deductive reasoning, because of human limitation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Plato and the Moving Image.Shai Biderman & Michael Weinman (eds.) - 2019 - Boston: Brill | Rodopi.
Conceptions of Truth in Plato’s Sophist.Michail Peramatzis - 2020 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (3):333-378.
Plato's Analogical Thought.Holly Moore - 2009 - Dissertation, Depaul University
On the Threefold Sense of Mimesis in Plato's Republic.James Risser - 2013 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):249-256.
What Plato Wrote.Danielle S. Allen - 2012-12-10 - In Neville Morley (ed.), Why Plato Wrote. Blackwell. pp. 70–78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
46 (#486,196)

6 months
9 (#511,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jill Gordon
Colby College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references