- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Imperfect Methods for Imperfect Democracies: Increasing Public Participation in Gene Editing Debates
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):77-79 (2023)
Abstract
Given some of the various possible impacts of clinical germline editing, we can expect robust disagreement about how best to regulate it. One can point to examples of the promise of editing: “rough...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Risks and Ethics of Human Gene Editing.Madeleine Hayenhjelm & Christer Nordlund - 2025 - Wiesbaden: Springer V.S.
Public views on gene editing and its uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Gene Editing: How Can You Ask “Whether” If You Don't Know “How”?Bryan Cwik - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (3):13-17.
Clinical trials of germline gene editing: The exploitation problem.Erik Malmqvist - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (7):688-695.
Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (3):183-187.
‘Eugenics is Back’? Historic References in Current Discussions of Germline Gene Editing.Robert Ranisch - 2019 - NanoEthics 13 (3):209-222.
Germline Gene Editing Applications and the Afro-communitarian Ubuntu Philosophy.Cornelius Ewuoso - 2023 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 12 (1):1-12.
Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters.Robert Sparrow - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):6-15.
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Donna Dickenson - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (1):75-77.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-22
Downloads
301 (#92,206)
6 months
92 (#66,739)
2023-06-22
Downloads
301 (#92,206)
6 months
92 (#66,739)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Bioethics Should Not Seek to Reflect Public Opinion.Benjamin Gregg - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (9):42-45.
References found in this work
The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.John M. Conley, R. Jean Cadigan, Arlene M. Davis, Eric T. Juengst, Kriste Kuczynski, Rami Major, Hayley Stancil, Julio Villa-Palomino, Margaret Waltz & Gail E. Henderson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):9-16.
The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing.Gyngell Christopher, Douglas Thomas & Savulescu Julian - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4):498-513.
Ethics Dumping: Case Studies from North-South Research Collaborations.Doris Schroeder, Julie Cook, François Hirsch, Solveig Fenet & Vasantha Muthuswamy (eds.) - 2017 - New York: Springer.
Creating Human Nature: The Political Challenges of Genetic Engineering.Benjamin Gregg - 2022 - Cambridge University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2