- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Some First Steps Toward Responsible Use of Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs by the Healthy
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):39-41 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy.Henry Greely, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald Kessler, Gazzaniga C., Campbell Michael, Farah Philip & J. Martha - 2008 - Nature 456:702-705.
Constraints on Regulatory Options for Putatively Cognitive Enhancing Drugs.Wayne Hall, Brad Partridge & Jayne Lucke - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):35-37.
Working While Under the Influence of Performance-Enhancing Drugs: Is One “More Responsible”?Frederic Gilbert - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (3):57-59.
Cognitive Enhancing Drugs.Charlotte R. Housden, Sharon Morein-Zamir & Barbara J. Sahakian - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 113–126.
Should we use Commitment Contracts to Regulate Student use of Cognitive Enhancing Drugs?John Danaher - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (7):568-578.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Sport, and the Ideal of Natural Athletic Performance”.Sigmund Loland - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (7):1-3.
Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs, Behavioral Training and the Mechanism of Cognitive Enhancement.Emma Peng Chien - 2013 - In Elisabeth Hildt & Andreas G. Franke (eds.), Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer. pp. 139-144.
Performance-Enhancing Drugs and Moral Line Drawing.Pam R. Sailors - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (6):16-17.
Prohibition or Coffee Shops: Regulation of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate for Enhancement Use by Healthy Adults.Veljko Dubljević - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):23-33.
Reflecting on the Past and Future of Neuroethics: The Brain on a Pedestal.Judy Illes - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):223-226.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-26
Downloads
30 (#756,477)
6 months
7 (#728,225)
2013-10-26
Downloads
30 (#756,477)
6 months
7 (#728,225)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Prohibition or Coffee Shops: Regulation of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate for Enhancement Use by Healthy Adults”.Veljko Dubljević - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (1):W1 - W8.
References found in this work
Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy.Henry Greely, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald Kessler, Gazzaniga C., Campbell Michael, Farah Philip & J. Martha - 2008 - Nature 456:702-705.
Prohibition or Coffee Shops: Regulation of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate for Enhancement Use by Healthy Adults.Veljko Dubljević - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):23-33.
Of Nails and Hammers.Henry T. Greely - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 501–520.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2