Religion and Ethics—II

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 31:135-146 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professor Sutherland has argued that ‘God wills the good’ should be regarded as an analytic truth, with the consequence that any account of what is God's will in which it does not appear to be good is either a mistake about God's will or a mistake about what is good.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theistic Activism and the Euthyphro Dilemma.David James Baggett - 2002 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Universalism and the Greater Good.Gordon Knight - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):98-103.
God and Good: Does God’s Existence Imply that Anything is Good.Jan Woleński - 2015 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), God, Truth, and Other Enigmas. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 59-68.
Does the ‘problem of evil’ rest on a mistake?Brian Davies - 2024 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 85 (1):8-22.
Why did God do that?Matthew Tingblad - 2023 - Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House Publishers. Edited by Josh McDowell.
Should We Will What God Wills?Daniel Schwartz Porzecanski - 2003 - Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):403-419.
Will to Mercy.Brian Davies - 1992 - In The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. New York: Clarendon Press.
The Theological Implications of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):133-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
48 (#458,202)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references