On the Surprising in Science and Logic

Review of Metaphysics 40 (4):631 - 655 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

QUINE'S DOCTRINE of the indeterminacy of translation is made possible by the principle of substitution characteristic of extensional logic. The same characteristic makes it impossible, in philosophy of science, to choose among theoretical models no one of which is obviously best suited to explain the facts. Hilary Putnam achieved a sort of closure to the problem of reference in philosophy of science, when he pointed out the implications of the Skolem-Löwenheim theorem. He said that besides the facts a theory is designed to explain, there are any number of unintended interpretations of the same theory that assign the correct truth values to all sentences of the theory. There can be no sound basis for deciding upon the sole interpretation for a theory. Following Putnam, some philosophers have abandoned the problem of reference in the context of axiomatic systems. Ian Hacking, for instance, prefers a notion of reference "that is not tied by any specific, binding theory about what is referred to." He has turned to the study of approximations and practical models, spurred on by the difficulty of reconciling axiomatic systems to scientific practice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Surprising In Science and Logic.Jean de Groot - 1987 - Review of Metaphysics 40 (4):631-655.
Representation and Reality. [REVIEW]J. Christopher Maloney - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 45 (2):426-428.
Independence-friendly logic and axiomatic set theory.Jaakko Hintikka - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):313-333.
Selected Logic Papers. [REVIEW]J. M. P. - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (1):159-159.
The Logic in Philosophy of Science.Hans Halvorson - 2019 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scientific realism bit by bit: part I. Kitcher on reference.Christina McLeish - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):668-686.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
64 (#331,207)

6 months
12 (#296,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jean De Groot
Catholic University of America

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references