The randomized controlled trial: Gold standard or merely standard?

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (4):516-34 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sham Surgeries: Have We Gone Too Far?Victor K. Wu & Mohit Bhandari - 2010 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 1 (2):141-152.
Mere anecdote: evidence and stories in medicine.Robin Nunn - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):920-926.
Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks.Joseph Herman Md - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):283-286.
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
EBM for the future.Alfred P. J. Lake - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):433-437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-21

Downloads
104 (#203,942)

6 months
18 (#162,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references