Progress in Science

Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 22 (1-2):1-31 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A new paradigm is emerging which places Charles Darwin's theory of evolution via natural selection into a larger conceptual framework with greater explanatory power. Darwinism needs to be reconceptualized as a scientific enterprise and philosophical worldview. A larger framework is needed to account for the immaterial laws of nature which guide evolutionary mechanisms and processes to achieve predetermined ends that reflect a superlative Intelligence, Mind or God. Curiously, Darwinism fails to explain intelligent observers who can make sense of the laws of nature. Immanuel Kant's conception of man as both phenomenon and noumenon suggests that man is the missing link between science and religion, and that the two views of genesis—-evolution and creation--are complementary rather than antithetical. Evolution should be taught as science, not ideology. Teaching evolution as science means opening the theory to critical scrutiny which can correct, modify, enrich, and develop the theory in interdisciplinary perspective. But the theory of evolution reaches well beyond science narrowly defined, and broaches philosophical, ethical, and theological dimensions which can be addressed only in interdisciplinary conversation bringing to the table insights from many disciplines. Finally, Darwinism as a materialist, reductionist worldview needs to be humanized, if not Christianized, and thus reach its full potential as science. It would then also recognize human exceptionalism, the teleological imperative, the principle of tolerance, and the fundamental religious insight that we live by faith.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,097

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Methodology of research and progress in science.Erwin Biser & Enos E. Witmer - 1947 - Philosophy of Science 14 (4):275-288.
The Progress of Science. [REVIEW]Joseph Lynch - 1942 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 17 (4):759-759.
Understanding the Progress of Science.C. D. McCoy - 2022 - In Insa Lawler, Kareem Khalifa & Elay Shech (eds.), Scientific Understanding and Representation: Modeling in the Physical Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 353-369.
Catholicism and the Progress of Science. [REVIEW]Crane Brinton - 1941 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 16 (1):198-199.
Ontological Progress in Science.Richard M. Burian & J. D. Trout - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):177 - 201.
Progress of Science and Interfaces of the World.Ivan B. Mikirtumov - 2023 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 60 (2):42-49.
Types of rationality and progress in science.V. Samchenko - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (23):238-245.
Realism and the Progress of Science.Frederick William Kroon - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 31:346-349.
Realism and the Progress of Science.Peter Smith - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-20

Downloads
13 (#1,362,980)

6 months
2 (#1,302,720)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Oskar Gruenwald
Institute for Interdisciplinary Research

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references