Perfect or Bounded Rationality?: Some Facts, Speculations and Proposals

Analyse & Kritik 26 (2):364-381 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Simple game experiments of the reward allocation, dictator and ultimatum type are used to demonstrate that true explanations of social phenomena cannot conceivably be derived in terms of the perfect rationality concept underlying neo-classical economics. We explore in some depth, if speculatively, how experimental game theory might bring us closer to a new synthesis or at least the nucleus of a general theory of ‘games and boundedly rational economic behavior’ with enhanced explanatory power.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral distance in dictators games.Fernando Aguiar, Pablo Brañas-Garza & Luis Miller - 2008 - Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4):344-354.
Introduction to Game Theory.Martin J. Osborne - 2004 - Oxford University Press USA.
Arbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium.Robert F. Nau & Kevin F. McCardle - 1991 - Theory and Decision 31 (2):199-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-19

Downloads
61 (#383,385)

6 months
7 (#614,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations