A Sociological Perspective on the Experience of Contention

Sociological Theory 40 (3):224-248 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contention in the form of protests, riots, and direct action is a central political practice in contemporary democracies. It is also a staple of sociological analysis, after slowly crystallizing as a distinct object of analysis from the 1970s onward. Lately, however, it has become unclear what this distinctiveness consists of and how it may help guide studies of contention: What distinguishes contention from other practices? I argue that contention can be seen as an ontologically distinctive experience. What sets this experience apart is that it expresses a potential for conflict that underlies all social formations. We can take these expressions of conflict as objects of analysis. This means asking how the conflict expressed in contentious practices is ascribed meaning. I develop this perspective theoretically and show how it may facilitate new empirical analyses of contention’s boundaries, its relation to truth, and ethical relations in contention.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-03

Downloads
19 (#1,120,317)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

On the Political.Chantal Mouffe - 2005 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (4):830-832.
Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology After Laclau.Oliver Marchart - 2018 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fugitive Democracy.Sheldon S. Wolin - 1994 - Constellations 1 (1):11-25.

View all 23 references / Add more references