Bohm's metaphors, causality, and the quantum potential

Erkenntnis 59 (1):77 - 95 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics yields a quantum potential, Q. In his early work, the effects of Q are understood in causal terms as acting through a real (quantum) field which pushes particles around. In his later work (with Basil Hiley), the causal understanding of Q appears to have been abandoned. The purpose of this paper is to understand how the use of certain metaphors leads Bohm away from a causal treatment of Q, and to evaluate the use of those metaphors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bohm's theory of quantum mechanics and the notion of classicality.Marij van Strien - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 71 (C):72-86.
Kant, Niels Bohr and Quantum Spontaneity.Willem McLoud - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 18 (47):63-88.
Interpretations of quantum field theory.Nick Huggett & Robert Weingard - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (3):370-388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
166 (#141,719)

6 months
6 (#876,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcello Guarini
University of Windsor

References found in this work

Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order.David Bohm - 1980 - New York: Routledge.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1966 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (3):190-191.

View all 22 references / Add more references