Louisiana's “Medically Futile” Unborn Child List: Ethical Lessons at the Post-Dobbs Intersection of Reproductive and Disability Justice

Hastings Center Report 53 (1):3-6 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ableist attitudes and structures regarding disability are increasingly recognized across all sectors of healthcare delivery. After Dobbs, novel questions arose in the USA concerning how to protect reproductive autonomy while avoiding discrimination against and devaluation of disabled persons. As a case study, we examine the Louisiana’s Department of Public Health August 1st Emergency Declaration, “List of Conditions that shall deem an Unborn Child ‘Medically Futile.’” We raise a number of medical, ethical, and public health concerns that lead us to argue the declaration should be rescinded. The ethically objectionable declaration provides valuable lessons concerning how to uphold both reproductive and disability justice in a post-Dobbs landscape.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Reproductive Injustices of Abortion Bans for Disability.Leslie Francis - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):490-496.
Philosophical and Ethical Issues in Disability.Jeffrey Blustein - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):573-587.
INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After Dobbs.Aziza Ahmed, Nicole Huberfeld & Linda C. McClain - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):463-467.
Protecting Health after Dobbs.Brietta R. Clark - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (6):6-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-30

Downloads
680 (#37,514)

6 months
137 (#35,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Laura Guidry-Grimes
Georgetown University (PhD)
Joel Michael Reynolds
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations