Modal logic and truth

Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):441 - 472 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I discuss in this paper a criticism of modal logic due to Donald Davidson and John Wallace. They have claimed that, to quote Wallace, “modal predicate calculus does not provide a reasonable standpoint from which to interpret a language” (1970, p. 147). The aim of this paper is to present and evaluate their argument for this claim

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Quantified Argument Calculus.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):120-146.
The Problem of Index-Initialisation in the Tempo-Modal Semantics.Jacek Wawer - 2019 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 30:21-41.
Logical Truth in Modal Logic.Matthew McKeon - 1996 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):351-361.
Temporal Reference in Linear Tense Logic.M. J. Cresswell - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2):173-200.
Suhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms.Zia Movahed - 2012 - Sophia Perennis 21:5-17.
Naming worlds in modal and temporal logic.D. M. Gabbay & G. Malod - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (1):29-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#209,973)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anil Gupta
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Names.Sam Cumming - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
More on Putnam and Tarski.Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Synthese 135 (1):37 - 47.
Principles for Possibilia.Christopher Peacocke - 2002 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51:119-145.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the frame of reference.John Wallace - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):117 - 150.

Add more references