- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of Susan Haack Defending Science -- Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism [Book Review]
The Philosophical Review 115 (1):131-133 (2003)
Abstract
Review of Susan Haack Defending Science -- Within Reason: Between Scientism and CynicismAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Susan Haack, Defending Science-Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism Reviewed by.Jeffrey Foss - 2004 - Philosophy in Review 24 (3):190-193.
Defending Science — Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism, by Susan Haack. [REVIEW]Derek Turner - 2004 - Disputatio 1 (17):84-90.
Susan Haack, Defending Science—Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books , 411 pp., $28.00. [REVIEW]Keith M. Parsons - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (2):390-395.
Susan Haack. Defending Science—Within Reason: Between Science and Cynicism. 411 pp., bibl., index. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2003. $28. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2006 - Isis 97 (4):808-809.
Defending Science—Within Reason: Between Science and Cynicism. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2006 - Isis 97:808-809.
Defending Science -- Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism.Susan Haack - 2011 - Prometheus Books.
Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues. Susan Haack. [REVIEW]Michael A. Gilbert - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (1):149-151.
Defending Science - Within Reason.Susan Haack - 1999 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 3 (2):187-212.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
37 (#599,577)
6 months
5 (#1,013,271)
2015-02-02
Downloads
37 (#599,577)
6 months
5 (#1,013,271)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On a Medicine of the Whole Person: away from scientistic reductionism and towards the embrace of the complex in clinical practice.Andrew Miles - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):941-949.
Argument from Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System.David M. Godden & Douglas Walton - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):261-286.
The epistemology of scientific evidence.Douglas Walton & Nanning Zhang - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (2):173-219.
Lyotard, postmodernism and science education: A rejoinder to Zembylas.Roland M. Schulz - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (6):633–656.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2