A tradition of natural kinds

Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):109-26 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy without natural kinds: a reply to Reydon & Ereshefsky.David Ludwig - 2024 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14 (3):1-10.
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds.P. D. Magnus - 2014 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (4).
A Note on the Dynamics of Psychiatric Classification.José Eduardo Porcher - 2014 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):27-47.
Why Hacking is wrong about human kinds.Rachel Cooper - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):73-85.
Interactive kinds.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Less Work for Theories of Natural Kinds.Matthew H. Slater - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
487 (#57,723)

6 months
14 (#222,755)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Hacking
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Natural Kindness.Matthew H. Slater - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):375-411.
Scientific kinds.Marc Ereshefsky & Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):969-986.
Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight.Ian Hacking - 2007 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 61:203-239.
Concepts are not a natural kind.Edouard Machery - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (3):444-467.

View all 136 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references