Itp, isp, and sch

&
Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (2):713-725 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/jsl.2019.2

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Itay Neeman. Aronszajn trees and failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9, no. 1 , pp. 139–157. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property at אּω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 1 , pp. 279–290. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 51, no. 5-6 , pp. 553–562. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at אּω2. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 3 , pp. 934–946. - Spencer Unger. Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 52, no. 5-6 , pp. 483–496. - Itay Neeman. The tree property up to אּω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. vol. 79, no. 2 , pp. 429–459. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):188-192.
Reviewed Work: Recent papers on the tree property. Aronszajn trees and failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9, no. 1 , The tree property at ℵ ω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 1 , The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable confinality. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 51, no. 5-6 , The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at [image]. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 3 , Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 52, no. 5-6 , The tree property up to ℵ ω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. vol. 79, no. 2 by Itay Neeman; Dima Sinapova; Spencer Unger. [REVIEW]Review by: James Cummings - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):188-192.
The tree property at the successor of a singular limit of measurable cardinals.Mohammad Golshani - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (1-2):3-25.
Injectives in finitely generated universal Horn classes.Michael H. Albert & Ross Willard - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):786-792.
Existentially closed algebras and boolean products.Herbert H. J. Riedel - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):571-596.
A note on sequences witnessing singularity, following Magidor and Sinapova.Moti Gitik - 2018 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 64 (3):249-253.
Strong tree properties for small cardinals.Laura Fontanella - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (1):317-333.
Reflection and not SCH with overlapping extenders.Moti Gitik - 2022 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 61 (5):591-597.
Another method for constructing models of not approachability and not SCH.Moti Gitik - 2021 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 60 (3):469-475.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-10

Downloads
28 (#805,576)

6 months
7 (#728,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The combinatorial essence of supercompactness.Christoph Weiß - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1710-1717.
A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited.Spencer Unger - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (12):1813-1831.

Add more references