On Reference Theory

Abstract

This is my initial look at Reference Theory. It argues that the speaker does not have the same knowledge as the listener. The speaker has an intimate point of view, but the listener's is general.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

A ‘no-reference’ theory of aesthetics.A. G. Pleydell-Pearce - 1968 - British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (4):407-409.
An analysis of the direct reference theory.Brieuc Tulou - 2024 - Dissertation, University of Geneva
Direct Reference Theory and Modes of Presentation.Naomi Shiraishi - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
An inconsistency in direct reference theory.George Bealer - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy 101 (11):574 - 593.
Is direct reference theory incompatible with physicalism?Mahrad Almotahari & Damien Rochford - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (5):255-268.
The foundations of Kaplan's direct reference theory for demonstratives.Lawrence D. Roberts - 1994 - Philosophia 23 (1-4):91-116.
Contra Bealer's reductio of Direct Reference Theory.Bjorn Jespersen & Marian Zouhar - 2011 - Logique Et Analyse 54 (216):487-502.
Frege’s Puzzle and the Direct Reference Theory.Filip Kawczyński - 2014 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Semantics and Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries. Preface. De Gruyter. pp. 109-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-10

Downloads
246 (#112,247)

6 months
59 (#98,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references