Learning about right and wrong: Ethics and language

Philosophy 78 (1):25-41 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The difference between right and wrong is not something that is taught; it is, necessarily, picked up by a child in the course of learning its native language, and parents have no choice about this. In learning the meaning of ‘steal’, for example, the child learns that such actions are wrong. It also develops, through a kind of conditioning, the appropriate feelings and attitudes. The very concept of a reason has a moral content; so that, in acquiring this concept, the child learns what counts as a good reason; and this includes altruistic and other moral reasons, no less than reasons of self-interest.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Right Kind of Reason for the Wrong Kind of Thing.Laura Tomlinson Makin - 2023 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 21 (1-2):106-126.
Reasons Wrong and Right.Nathaniel Sharadin - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):371-399.
In Defense of the Wrong Kind of Reason.Christopher Howard - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):53-62.
Defending the Right To Do Wrong.Ori J. Herstein - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
The Wrong Kind of Reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (9):437 - 457.
Morality Without God.Alan Mandelberg - 2015 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 23 (1):113-132.
Moral Reasons: Internal and External1.David B. Wong - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):436-558.
Fit-Related Reasons to Inquire.Genae Matthews - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
129 (#169,751)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?