The Universal Core of Knowledge

Synthese 192 (3):769-786 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many epistemologists think we can derive important theoretical insights by investigating the English word ‘know’ or the concept it expresses. However, fewer than six percent of the world’s population are native English speakers, and some empirical evidence suggests that the concept of knowledge is culturally relative. So why should we think that facts about the word ‘know’ or the concept it expresses have important ramifications for epistemology? This paper argues that the concept of knowledge is universal: it is expressed by some word in every natural language. I also explore the implications of this thesis for philosophical methodology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Manifesto (Epistemology for the Rest of the World).Stephen Stich & Masaharu Mizumoto - 2017 - In Stephen Stich, Masaharu Mizumoto & Eric McCready (eds.), Epistemology for the rest of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Function of Knowledge.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2021 - Analysis 81 (1):100-107.
What's the point of knowing how?Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):693-708.
Fallibilism and the Value of Knowledge.Michael Hannon - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1119-1146.
Two purposes of knowledge-attribution and the contextualism debate.Matthew McGrath - 2015 - In David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.
Epistemic Analysis and the Possibility of Good Informants.James MacBain - 2004 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 8 (2):193-211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-09

Downloads
204 (#122,693)

6 months
4 (#1,246,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?