Biobehavioural basis of art

Technoetic Arts 6 (3):259-268 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the human activity of art making and art usage has a biological foundation which precedes language acquisition. Together with cultural dynamics we have created ourselves as we have created our arts. I attempt a synthesis of the theories of Dissanayake and Joyce which shows the human trait of art behaviour evolved as surely as did the behaviours of mating and hunting.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ways of Making, Seeing and Thinking about Art: Art Expression and Art Education.Alexandra Mouriki & Antonis Vaos - 2009 - International Journal of the Arts in Society: Annual Review 4 (2):207-216.
What is Evolutionary Aesthetics for?Roberta Dreon - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):95-111.
Art and Intimacy.Ellen Dissanayake - 2000 - University of Washington Press.
Art and Intimacy.Ellen Dissanayake - 2000 - University of Washington Press.
The Buck Passing Theory of Art.James O. Young - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (4): 421-433.
Is Proprioceptive Art Possible?Markus Schrenk - 2014 - In Priest Graham & Young Damon (eds.), Philosophy and the Martial Arts: Engagement. Open Court. pp. 101-116.
Experience and theory in aesthetics.Arnold Berleant - 1986 - In Michael H. Mitias (ed.), Possibility of the aesthetic experience. Norwell, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Academic. pp. 91--106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
35 (#651,676)

6 months
10 (#423,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Daniel Dennett - 1994 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):169-174.
Essay Review: Sociobiology: Twenty-Five Years Later. [REVIEW]Edward O. Wilson - 1975 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):577-584.
What Is Art for?Ellen Dissanayake - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):392-393.
Philosophy of art.Virgil C. Aldrich - 1963 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Philosophy of Art.H. Gene Blocker - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (3):328-329.

View all 8 references / Add more references