Collective criminal responsibility: unfair or redundant

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (2):118-129 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues, against Pettit’s thesis about the incorporation of responsibility, that holding collective agents criminally responsible is necessarily either redundant or unfair: redundant if responsibility can be distributed without remainder over individual persons; unfair if it cannot. It should be the task of legal systems to create chains of individual criminal responsibility encompassing executives, officials, and members of corporate agents

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-25

Downloads
18 (#1,118,624)

6 months
2 (#1,689,990)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2016 - Analysis 77 (3):anw022.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The argument from normative autonomy for collective agents.Kirk Ludwig - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):410–427.

Add more references