Heidegger, McLuhan and Schumacher on Form and Its Aliens

Theory, Culture and Society 33 (6):99-105 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article uses the ideas of Marshall McLuhan (and to a lesser extent Martin Heidegger) to argue for a non-relational approach to architecture. The word ‘form’ is used throughout the arts and humanities, though in different ways depending on the term to which it is opposed: as in form vs. function, form vs. content, and form vs. matter. In his book The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Patrik Schumacher argues that form/function is the lead-distinction of the architectural profession. I hold that Schumacher cannot be right in this claim, since form and function are both too relational in character to form a true opposition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
49 (#453,573)

6 months
7 (#749,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Harman
American University in Cairo

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references