Moral particularism and transduction

Philosophical Issues 15 (1):44–55 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can someone be reasonable or justified in accepting a specific moral judgment not based on the prior acceptance of a general exceptioness moral principle, where acceptance of a general principle might be tacit or implicit and might not be expressible in language? This issue is an instance of a wider issue about direct or transductive inference. Developments in statistical learning theory show that such an inference can be more effective than alternative methods using inductive generalization and so can be reasonable. This result carries over to moral transduction, although it is a difficult empirical issue whether people actually engage in any sort of transduction, including moral transduction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,706

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Learning and Moral Realism.William A. Rottschaefer - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:37-43.
Moral Reasoning and Justification in Medical Ethics.Kyungsuk Choi - 2003 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Why Moral Principles?Joe Mintoff - 2016 - Mind 125 (500):1133-1159.
Moral particularism.Brad Hooker & Margaret Olivia Little (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Use of Principles in Moral Reasoning.Thomas Sban Tomlinson - 1980 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Science and ethics: Demarcation, holism and logical consequences.Nick Zangwill - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):126-138.
Reasonable standards and exculpating moral ignorance.Nathan Biebel - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (1):1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
157 (#153,247)

6 months
15 (#212,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gilbert Harman
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Moral Perception.Andrew Cullison - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):159-175.
Reasons and Moral Principles.Pekka Väyrynen - 2018 - In Daniel Star, The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 839-61.
Moral particularism in the light of deontic logic.Xavier Parent - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):75-98.
Modelling ethical rules of lying with answer set programming.Jean-Gabriel Ganascia - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):39-47.
Moral Particularism.Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The sources of normativity.Christine Marion Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Moral reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Cambridge: Blackwell.

View all 21 references / Add more references