The principles of demonstration and tekmeriodic proofs in the late-antique commentary tradition

Revue de Synthèse 134 (2):249-266 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Aristotle’s late-antique commentators read into his theory of demonstration the notion of tekmeriodic proofs in attempt to integrate into the theory of demonstration the assumption that the principles of demonstration should be evident. In so doing, I trace the late antique commentators’ view to Alexander of Aphrodisias’ discussion of the principles of demonstration, showing how his assumption that the principles of demonstration should be evident underlies their notions of tekmeriodic proofs.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Principles and Proofs. [REVIEW]Michael J. Degnan - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):154-156.
Aristotle's Theory of Demonstration.Robin Smith - 2008 - In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 51–65.
Aristotle's demonstrative logic.John Corcoran - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-04

Downloads
24 (#906,477)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Orna Harari
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aristotle: Posterior Analytics.John W. Konkle - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):510.
Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proofs.Orna Harari - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):366-375.
Alexander Von aphrodisias in einem altarmenischen kategorien-kommentar.Ernst Günther Schmidt - 1966 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 110 (1-2):277-286.

Add more references