The Theodicies of Josiah Royce and John Hick

Dissertation, The University of Tennessee (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the solutions to the problem of evil in relation to God proposed by Josiah Royce and John Hick--solutions which maintain that evil is necessary for moral and spiritual development. Hick and Royce were chosen because as strong advocates of this view, they, nevertheless, represent contrasting conceptions of God. Royce was a philosophical idealist, while Hick represents Christian theism. ;I first isolated the usual problems for theism with regard to evil and considered the weaknesses of the usual explanations. Then I developed Royce's idealistic conception of God which he claimed avoided those weaknesses. Next I set forth his theodicy and critically evaluated it. Having completed my analysis of Royce, I turned to Hick's conception of God and his theodicy, comparing the latter with Royce's and critically evaluating it. Finally, I summarized the main points of the type of theodicy represented by Royce and Hick and followed this with a summary of the main problems. ;Royce maintained that God suffers in order to be perfect. Moral and spiritual perfection consists not of innocence but of overcoming evil. Because human selves are fragments of God's life, God suffers in us and through us. Hick also maintained that developed moral and spiritual character is superior to a preestablished state. Therefore, God brought humans into existence in an undeveloped state and maintained an epistemic distance from them in order that they might develop freely. Thus, in both Royce and Hick, the conditions that make evil a virtual inevitability are necessary. ;The major findings of this study were that the type of theodicy advocated by Royce and Hick suffers from serious weaknesses. God is absolutely good but requires evil to accomplish the divine purpose. A large degree of moral and spiritual development does not require evil, yet God who is absolutely good requires it for development. Excessive evil is admitted to be a mystery and yet this mystery is also used by God. The final outcome of the process either requires abandoning the original necessary conditions or has no redemptive value on an individual basis

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Josiah Royce on Job and the Problem of Evil.J. Caleb Clanton - 2014 - Philosophy and Theology 26 (1):65-95.
The Theodicy of John Hick: A Critical Defense.James Jefferson Broome - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Evil and the Evidence for God. [REVIEW]David E. Schrader - 1995 - Review of Metaphysics 49 (1):135-136.
Soul-making theodicy and compatibilism: new problems and a new interpretation.Michael Barnwell - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (1):29-46.
Epistemic Evil, Divine Hiddenness, and Soul-Making.Benjamin McCraw - 2015 - In Benjamin McCraw & Robert Arp (eds.), The Problem of Evil: New Philosophical Directions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. pp. 109-126.
Josiah Royce.T. L. S. Sprigge - 2006 - In The God of Metaphysics. Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Free Will and Soul‐Making Theodicies.Daniel Speak - 2014 - In Justin P. McBrayer & Daniel Howard-Snyder (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil. Wiley. pp. 205–221.
The Problem of Suffering in the Qur'an.John Bowker - 1969 - Religious Studies 4 (2):183 - 202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references