Conserving Nature; Preserving Identity

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 42 (1-2):176-196 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two broad approaches to environmental ethics. The “conservationist” approach on which we should conserve the environment when it is in our interest to do so and the “preservationist” approach on which we should preserve the environment even when it is not in our interest to do so. We propose a new “relational” approach that tells us to preserve nature as part of what makes us who we are or could be. Drawing from Confucian and Daoist texts, we argue that human identities are, or should be, so intimately tied to nature that human interests evolve in relationship to nature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
81 (#257,995)

6 months
7 (#699,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Wong
Duke University
Nicole Hassoun
State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

Chinese ethics.David Wong - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references