Science, Certainty, and Descartes

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:249 - 262 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the 1630s Descartes recognized that he could not expect all legitimate claims in natural science to meet the standard of absolute certainty. The realization resulted from a change in his physics, which itself arose not through methodological reflections, but through developments in his substantive metaphysical doctrines. Descartes discovered the metaphysical foundations of his physics in 1629-30; as a consequence, the style of explanation employed in his physical writings changed. His early methodological conceptions, as preserved in the Rules and sketched in Part Two of the Discourse, pertained primarily to his early work in optics. By the early 1630s, Descartes was concerned with new methodological problems pertaining to the postulation of micro-mechanisms. Recognition of the need to employ a method of hypothesis led him to lower the standard of certainty required of particular explanations in his mature physics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cartesian Psychology of Antoine Le Grand.Gary Hatfield - 2013 - In Mihnea Dobre Tammy Nyden (ed.), Cartesian Empiricisms. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 251-274.
Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms.Helen Hattab - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Certainty and Explanation in Descartes’s Philosophy of Science.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (2):302-327.
Descartes.Tom Sorell - 1987 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Geometry, Time and Force in the Diagrams of Descartes, Galileo, Torricelli and Newton.Emily R. Grosholz - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:237 - 248.
Descartes’ Discours as a Plan for a Universal Science.Patrick Brissey - 2013 - Studia UBB. Philosophia [Special Issue on Descartes' Scientific and Philosophical Disputes with His Contemporaries] 58 (2):37-60.
Descartes' Theistic Metaphysics in its Scholastic Context.Blake Dean Dutton - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
1,132 (#16,720)

6 months
131 (#38,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Hatfield
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Sensible ends: Latent teleology in Descartes' account of sensation.Alison J. Simmons - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (1):49-75.
Scientia, diachronic certainty, and virtue.Saja Parvizian - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9165-9192.
Was Spinoza a Naturalist?Alexander Douglas - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):77-99.
Analogy and falsification in Descartes’ physics.Gideon Manning - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):402-411.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry.Bernard Williams - 1978 - Hassocks [Eng.]: Routledge.
Galileo Studies.Alexandre Koyré - 1978 - Humanities Press.
Force (God) in Descartes' physics.Gary C. Hatfield - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (2):113-140.

View all 11 references / Add more references